Created by: Ramona Robison
Created on: Tuesday, Aug 9th, 2016
Created on: Tuesday, Aug 9th, 2016
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
Very High
Answer / Justification:
P. wallichii is naturalized in California in 3 counties according to Calflora. It is also naturalized in Washington, Oregon, Monatana and Massachusetts in the United States, and Canada, Europe and New Zealand.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
2
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
P. wallichii is naturalized in California in 3 counties according to Calflora. It is also naturalized in Washington, Oregon, Monatana and Massachusetts in the United States, and Canada, Europe and New Zealand. It occurs in a climate that matches California in Washington and Oregon.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
2
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
P. wallichii is reported as invasive in its native range in northern India (Kala and Shrivastava, 2004), as well as in its non-native range in Belgium and the UK (CABI). In the western USA it is a declared noxious weed in the states of Montana, California, Washington and Oregon (CABI).
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
3
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
P. wallichii is reported as invasive in its native range in northern India (Kala and Shrivastava, 2004), as well as in its non-native range in Belgium and the UK (CABI). In the western USA it is a declared noxious weed in the states of Montana, California, Washington and Oregon (CABI). In Washington "It grows vigorously into dense colonies that exclude native vegetation, alters natural ecosystems and is difficult to eradicate. It poses a significant threat to riparian areas, where it can survive severe floods. Small fragments can form new plants." Some of the Washington P. wallichii distribution matches the climate in California.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
Very High
Answer / Justification:
Fallopia japonica (Polygonum cuspidatum), Fallopia sachalinensis (P. sachalinense), and P. polystachyum (former name of Persicaria wallichii) are all considered invasive in the Pacific Northwest and occur in climates which match California's.
Yes or No:
No
Points:
0
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
Although there are locations in Washington and Oregon which match California's climate, most of the other locations (northern Europe and New Zealand), do not match California's climate.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
It grows vigorously and creates large and dense stands that exclude native vegetation and prevent tree seedlings from growing. P. wallichii can greatly alter natural ecosystems and promotes the erosion of river banks. In Washington "It grows vigorously into dense colonies that exclude native vegetation, alters natural ecosystems and is difficult to eradicate. It poses a significant threat to riparian areas, where it can survive severe floods. Small fragments can form new plants."
Yes or No:
No
Points:
0
Confidence Level:
Medium
Answer / Justification:
There is no information on whether P. wallichii promotes or changes fire regimes.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
No
Points:
0
Confidence Level:
Medium
Answer / Justification:
P. wallichii is not listed as toxic on reference websites. In some cases goat grazing is used for control of the species.
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
Medium
Answer / Justification:
P. wallichii grows as high as 6 feet and can form impenetrable thickets along streams and in wet areas. Canes from previous years can persist and could also block movement.
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
Small fragments can form new plants.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
Small fragments can form new plants.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
P. wallichii has bisexual, insect-pollinated flowers and reproduces sexually by seeds in its native range. Several sources (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007; Ison, 2011) report that seed production is rare in California, British Columbia and the UK.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
No
Points:
0
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
Several sources (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007; Ison, 2011) report that seed production is rare in California, British Columbia and the UK. Therefore seed production would be low if it occurs in California.
Yes or No:
No
Points:
0
Confidence Level:
Medium
Answer / Justification:
Several sources (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007; Ison, 2011) report that seed production is rare in California, British Columbia and the UK. Therefore chance of significant germination is low.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
No
Points:
0
Confidence Level:
Medium
Answer / Justification:
Several sources (DiTomaso and Healy, 2007; Ison, 2011) report that seed production is rare in California, British Columbia and the UK. There is no information available on when viable seed is production begins in California or elsewhere.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
No
Points:
0
Confidence Level:
Medium
Answer / Justification:
The flowering period of P. wallichii is August to September, and it sets fruit from September until October.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
Medium
Answer / Justification:
Means of dispersal include wind, water, animal movements, translocation by humans or accidental transport by human agency.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
High
Answer / Justification:
Seeds of P. wallichii are dispersed by wind and water, while rhizome and stem fragments are dispersed in waterways or by flooding.
Reference(s):
Yes or No:
Yes
Points:
1
Confidence Level:
Medium
Answer / Justification:
Means of dispersal include wind, water, animal movements, translocation by humans or accidental transport by human agency. Stem or root fragments can be spread in contaminated fill material (Soll, 2004).
Reference(s):
Washington: http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/detail.asp?weed=104
CABI: http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/120210
Invasive Plant Atlas: http://www.invasiveplantatlas.org/subject.html?sub=6230
Reviewed by Eric Wrubel.
- < 13 : accept (low risk of invasiveness)
- 13 - 15 : evaluate further
- > 15 : reject (high risk of invasiveness)
PRE Score:
17
Number of questions answered:
20
Screener Confidence (%):
74.0
Organization:
Evaluation visibility:
Public - accessible to all site users